Why the internet blames Patrick Clancy for the deaths of his children | CNN
cnn.com
Patrick Clancy was ruled out as a suspect, yet the internet convicted him anyway — why do high-profile tragedies reliably produce a wrongly accused bystander?
Scapegoat TheoryProportionality BiasInstitutional DistrustAvailability Heuristic

Theory Briefing
- Patrick Clancy was officially cleared as a suspect, yet online communities continue to treat him as the likely perpetrator.
- High-profile legal cases consistently generate conspiracy theories that target exonerated individuals, a pattern the article directly examines.
- The gap between official findings and public suspicion reveals how distrust of institutions fuels alternative guilt narratives.
- Viral attention on a case can lock in early suspicions before facts emerge, making later exculpatory evidence harder to absorb.