Was Paul Mescal being 'not masculine enough' the reason Gladiator II flopped? | Movies
theguardian.com
Paul Mescal was called "not masculine enough" for Gladiator II — and now fans are debating whether casting killed the film's box office.
Stereotype ThreatExpectancy EffectSocial Identity TheoryAudience Reception Theory

Theory Briefing
- Paul Mescal faced public criticism for lacking traditional masculinity before Gladiator II even released, seeding doubt about his fit for the role.
- The most-discussed theory pins the film's underperformance on casting, with audiences allegedly rejecting Mescal as a credible action lead.
- Jacob Elordi's name appears in the conversation, suggesting alternative casting choices are being floated as part of the post-mortem debate.
- The article frames the masculinity critique as a possible self-fulfilling prophecy — pre-release doubt shaping audience expectations and ticket sales.