theorypedia
← Back to feed

The First Great Compound War: Why America Is Fighting Iran With an Obsolete Theory of Victory

smallwarsjournal.com

America's Iran campaign may be built on a theory of victory — battlefield dominance — that the Compound Age has already made obsolete.

Theory of VictorySystems ThinkingClausewitzian War TheoryStrategic Mismatch
The First Great Compound War: Why America Is Fighting Iran With an Obsolete Theory of Victory

Theory Briefing

  • The article argues the Iran conflict is the first major war of the "Compound Age," where no single battlefield win can decide the outcome.
  • Battlefield dominance, America's long-standing theory of victory, is framed as mismatched to an era of layered, systemic threats.
  • The piece calls for a new systemic theory of victory that accounts for interconnected political, military, and technological pressures simultaneously.
  • The gap between winning fights and winning wars is presented as the central strategic danger facing U.S. planners right now.