The First Great Compound War: Why America Is Fighting Iran With an Obsolete Theory of Victory
smallwarsjournal.com
America's Iran campaign may be built on a theory of victory — battlefield dominance — that the Compound Age has already made obsolete.
Theory of VictorySystems ThinkingClausewitzian War TheoryStrategic Mismatch

Theory Briefing
- The article argues the Iran conflict is the first major war of the "Compound Age," where no single battlefield win can decide the outcome.
- Battlefield dominance, America's long-standing theory of victory, is framed as mismatched to an era of layered, systemic threats.
- The piece calls for a new systemic theory of victory that accounts for interconnected political, military, and technological pressures simultaneously.
- The gap between winning fights and winning wars is presented as the central strategic danger facing U.S. planners right now.