The Fifth Circuit's Dangerous Obsession with DeRay Mckesson | Balls and Strikes
ballsandstrikes.org
The Fifth Circuit keeps reviving a case arguing a protest organizer is liable for violence he didn't commit — how far can legal responsibility stretch?
Proximate CauseChilling EffectForeseeability DoctrineCivil Liability Theory

Theory Briefing
- The Fifth Circuit's theory holds that DeRay Mckesson, a veteran protest organizer, should have foreseen that violence could erupt at his protest.
- The case tests whether organizing a demonstration makes someone legally responsible for the independent harmful acts of attendees.
- Critics call the causal chain between Mckesson's leadership and a third party's violence dangerously attenuated and fanciful.
- The ruling's logic could expose any experienced protest organizer to civil liability simply because they knew crowds carry risk.