theorypedia
← Back to feed

The Fifth Circuit's Dangerous Obsession with DeRay Mckesson | Balls and Strikes

ballsandstrikes.org

The Fifth Circuit keeps reviving a case arguing a protest organizer is liable for violence he didn't commit — how far can legal responsibility stretch?

Proximate CauseChilling EffectForeseeability DoctrineCivil Liability Theory
The Fifth Circuit's Dangerous Obsession with DeRay Mckesson | Balls and Strikes

Theory Briefing

  • The Fifth Circuit's theory holds that DeRay Mckesson, a veteran protest organizer, should have foreseen that violence could erupt at his protest.
  • The case tests whether organizing a demonstration makes someone legally responsible for the independent harmful acts of attendees.
  • Critics call the causal chain between Mckesson's leadership and a third party's violence dangerously attenuated and fanciful.
  • The ruling's logic could expose any experienced protest organizer to civil liability simply because they knew crowds carry risk.