Lindsay Clancy trial: psychologist says he doubts claim she was hallucinating
theguardian.com
A psychologist doubts Lindsay Clancy was hallucinating when she killed her children — putting her core defense claim under direct expert fire.
Expert Witness BiasInsanity DefensePostpartum PsychosisAttribution Theory

Theory Briefing
- A psychologist testifying at trial says he doubts Clancy was hallucinating, directly challenging the defense's central argument.
- The hallucination claim is the linchpin of Clancy's case — if jurors reject it, her legal strategy largely collapses.
- Expert disagreement over mental states at the moment of a crime is notoriously hard to resolve, leaving juries to weigh dueling interpretations.
- Conspiracy theories about the case are reportedly spreading online, showing how high-profile trials shape — and distort — public understanding of mental illness defenses.