Lindsay Clancy admits to killing their children. So why is there an online groundswell ...
local3news.com
Lindsay Clancy admitted to killing her children, yet a vocal online movement insists she's the real victim — why does a confession spark sympathy rather than condemnation?
Moral DisengagementAttribution TheoryCrowd PsychologyInsanity Defense

Theory Briefing
- Clancy confessed to killing her children, yet online communities have rallied around her as a victim rather than a perpetrator.
- Supporters argue severe postpartum psychosis stripped her of agency, framing the act as a medical failure rather than a crime.
- The case has split public opinion on where legal guilt ends and mental illness begins, fueling conspiracy-style distrust of the prosecution.
- Online groundswells around sympathetic defendants often reshape jury-pool sentiment and pressure courts well before a verdict is reached.