False information and "Weather Warfare" conspiracy theories follow forest fires in US ...
ctif.org
Forest fires spark viral claims they were deliberately set to clear land for data centres — why do disasters reliably breed intentional-cause theories?
Proportionality BiasConspiracy Theory FormationInformation HazardScapegoating

Theory Briefing
- Online conspiracy theories surged after the US forest fires, falsely claiming the blazes were intentionally ignited to make way for data centres.
- The "Weather Warfare" framing shows how a dramatic, technology-linked villain can anchor a false narrative faster than official explanations spread.
- Disasters with visible, large-scale destruction tend to attract intentional-cause theories because random catastrophe feels harder to accept than a named culprit.
- The data-centre claim gives the theory an economic motive, making it feel more plausible and shareable even without supporting evidence.