22 courts have rejected Trump DOJ's voter roll crusade. DOJ says they're all just wrong
democracydocket.com
The Trump DOJ has lost the same voter-roll legal argument in 22 courts — yet keeps filing it, betting the next judge will break the streak.
Sunk Cost FallacyPrincipal-Agent ProblemStrategic LitigationSeparation of Powers

Theory Briefing
- The DOJ has lost the same core voter-roll legal theory in 22 consecutive courts, including those with judges from both parties.
- Rather than revising its argument after repeated losses, the department's response is that every single ruling was simply wrong.
- The pattern raises a question about whether the strategy is about winning in court or achieving a political effect through repeated litigation.
- Judges appointed by presidents of both parties have rejected the theory, undercutting any claim the losses reflect partisan bias on the bench.