Observers of May's nuclear non-proliferation talks in New
York say they saw real progress for the first time in 10 years.
Mark Leon Goldberg, in UN Dispatch, noticed an echo of familiarity
with the approach and tone the administration stuck to this
particularly thorny issue. "It's Obama's 'Theory
of Change' at work in the international arena," says
Goldberg.
Traditionally, solving a policy issue with stiff opposition
resistance - like Health Care - in Washington DC requires brute
force. Get the votes, push it through and do the best you can to
avoid a filibuster and veto.
No so with Barack Obama, writes 'The American Prospect's' Mark Schmitt. To Schmitt, Obama's theory of change owes more toward the tactics he learned as a community organizer than elected representative.
He writes: "Obama, takes conservatism seriously...actually
acknowledging the the GOP as having some ideas worth
considering."
Simple as that sounds it reflects a nearly 180 degree change
from the traditional locus of the Democratic party. Obama swaps
outright dismissal for consideration while at the same time being
quick to remind all that disagreements will arise. This is
foundation of Obama's change theory and it may be the
archimedean lever that allows him to move one of the most immutable
forces in the Universe: Washington DC's company
town-business-as-usual-power-structure.
In Schmitt's theory, taking the ideology serious (vs.
outright dismissal) allows Obama tactical leverage to force the
other side to the table to solve a problem. It cuts the Gordian
knot -- and places the emphasis not on the differences, but on each
party's ability to solve problems known to all. The goal thus
defined puts a dynamic in place more wholly defined and controlled
by Obama.
To Schmitt, this goes right to Obama's leadership roots.
The across-the-table, let's solve
this-thing-or-parts-of-this-thing approach is the hallmark of an
effective community organizer.
Community leaders work with local governments with entrenched
power structures and spoils systems. That kind of opposition simply
doesn't go away. So, a successful organizer co-opts them in a
solution of their own definition.
This is the power of Obama's commitment to
bipartisanship. By expressly seeking a bipartisan solution, Obama
takes the high ground, effectively forcing the opposition into one
of two responses: solve the problem in a bipartisan manner or
obstruct.
The latter response does little more electorally for the
opposition than throw red meat to a base they've already
captured. In a Senate so close to a veto-proof majority, all it
takes is co-opting one or two GOP senators for filibuster-proof
votes. To Schmitt, the strategy is both realpolitik and uncynical.
Like elections, policy issues are won in the middle.
Here's Schmitt participating on a panel assessing Obama's first 100 days.
Get More...
To learn more, make sure your first stop is Mark
Schmitt's original article:
'Obama's Theory of Change' on the 'American Prospect' website.
http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_theory_of_change_primary
Obama is doing what he wants, when he wants. His policys are too far left for even the main stream, as will be proven as he continues to take and demand more and more power. He has mainstream media on his side. He has already made many, many mistakes, and in his own mind he feels no one will dare go against him. Media bias has so impower him that he feels free to do as he wishes. Once all his taxes are in place, the American public will wake up to what thay have allowed take place.