Subscribe: Subscribe by Email RSS Follow us on Twitter Login | Register |

Obama's Theory of Change

karlos on June 4, 2009
Barack Obama at a lectern that says 'change'
ABCNEWS.COM
From American Prospect's Mark Schmitt. Policy issues can be solved in a bipartisan manner through leadership that simultaneously: acknowledges the intractable positions of the opposition, forces a multilateral dialogue and; acts as the sole defining agent of the eventual solution's components. The Obama administration is applying this in DC and taking it international.
Agree 67% / Disagree 33%
One way to deal with...bad-faith opposition is draw the person in, treat them as if they were operating in good faith, and draw them into a conversation about how they actually would solve the problem. If they have nothing, it shows.

Observers of May's nuclear non-proliferation talks in New York say they saw real progress for the first time in 10 years. Mark Leon Goldberg, in UN Dispatch, noticed an echo of familiarity with the approach and tone the administration stuck to this particularly thorny issue. "It's Obama's 'Theory of Change' at work in the international arena," says Goldberg.

Traditionally, solving a policy issue with stiff opposition resistance - like Health Care - in Washington DC requires brute force. Get the votes, push it through and do the best you can to avoid a filibuster and veto.

No so with Barack Obama, writes 'The American Prospect's' Mark Schmitt. To Schmitt, Obama's theory of change owes more toward the tactics he learned as a community organizer than elected representative.

He writes: "Obama, takes conservatism seriously...actually acknowledging the the GOP as having some ideas worth considering."

Simple as that sounds it reflects a nearly 180 degree change from the traditional locus of the Democratic party. Obama swaps outright dismissal for consideration while at the same time being quick to remind all that disagreements will arise. This is foundation of Obama's change theory and it may be the archimedean lever that allows him to move one of the most immutable forces in the Universe: Washington DC's company town-business-as-usual-power-structure.

In Schmitt's theory, taking the ideology serious (vs. outright dismissal) allows Obama tactical leverage to force the other side to the table to solve a problem. It cuts the Gordian knot -- and places the emphasis not on the differences, but on each party's ability to solve problems known to all. The goal thus defined puts a dynamic in place more wholly defined and controlled by Obama.

To Schmitt, this goes right to Obama's leadership roots. The across-the-table, let's solve this-thing-or-parts-of-this-thing approach is the hallmark of an effective community organizer.

Community leaders work with local governments with entrenched power structures and spoils systems. That kind of opposition simply doesn't go away. So, a successful organizer co-opts them in a solution of their own definition.

This is the power of Obama's commitment to bipartisanship. By expressly seeking a bipartisan solution, Obama takes the high ground, effectively forcing the opposition into one of two responses: solve the problem in a bipartisan manner or obstruct.

The latter response does little more electorally for the opposition than throw red meat to a base they've already captured. In a Senate so close to a veto-proof majority, all it takes is co-opting one or two GOP senators for filibuster-proof votes. To Schmitt, the strategy is both realpolitik and uncynical. Like elections, policy issues are won in the middle.

Here's Schmitt participating on a panel assessing Obama's first 100 days.

Get More...
To learn more, make sure your first stop is Mark Schmitt's original article:

'Obama's Theory of Change' on the 'American Prospect' website.

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_theory_of_change_primary

Last updated June 4 2009, 1:44 PM EDT

Comments

Horseapples - Jun 11, 2009 6:53 PM

Obama is doing what he wants, when he wants. His policys are too far left for even the main stream, as will be proven as he continues to take and demand more and more power. He has mainstream media on his side. He has already made many, many mistakes, and in his own mind he feels no one will dare go against him. Media bias has so impower him that he feels free to do as he wishes. Once all his taxes are in place, the American public will wake up to what thay have allowed take place.

karlos - Jul 30, 2009 8:49 PM

I don't know...I wouldn't got that far. In the first year of a President's first term (especially after a landslide) it always appears like the Prez has a blank check.

But then, they have to deal with Congress and the Supreme Court, take a few licks and things return to normal. This is what's happening right now.

One also has to consider the American public *did* give the Democrats Congress and *did* elect Obama over McCain by a landslide.

It can't all be because Bush completely sucked.

Leave a Comment

Login, or fill in the required fields below.





Allowed tags: <b> <i> <p> <br> <a> <ol> <ul> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <em> <strong> <tt> <blockquote> <div>

Submit Submit