Subscribe: Subscribe by Email RSS Follow us on Twitter Login | Register |

Fantasy Football Theories: Selfish Gene/Selfish Team

Simon Wright on October 27, 2009
Fantasy Football replaces the home team concept with the “selfish team” ethos patterned after Darwin's “selfish gene.”
Agree 100% / Disagree 0%

Fantasy Football is a dog-eat-dog world where the survival of the fittest principle holds center stage. It's tempting, therefore, to say that the inherent attraction of fantasy football is completely Darwinian, albeit that the concept of the Selfish Gene is replaced by that of the Selfish Team.

The Selfish Team:

There is no room for sentimentality in biological evolution. Nature can be harsh and the process of natural selection ensures that it is only the fittest that get to become ancestors. Similarly, there can be no room for sentimentality when choosing your fantasy football team. You can be sure that the winners will be those who use hard-nosed analysis to pick the players who have traits that maximize the probability of their team thriving.

Talking of evolution and Darwinism, the eminent science writer Richard Dawkins has postulated that evolution happens at the level of the gene rather than the individual or group. So while evolution may be about the Selfish Gene, fantasy football could be said to be about the Selfish Team!

Your role as manager of the Selfish Team is quite simple. It is to score as many points as possible, to secure the satisfaction of beating friends' teams and to win prizes. Whilst evolution is predicated around the concept of choosing a mate, fantasy football revolves around weighing up potential players. You probably have little desire to mate with your selected players but you have chosen them based on your view of how successful they will make your "baby", I mean "team". This may even mean picking players that you personally despise, and may lead to the bizarre situation where you are watching a match and rooting for players from teams you don't normally support!

Let's look then at some reasons why the Darwinian concept of survival of the fittest wins out over community when we sign up for a fantasy football competition:

* Competitiveness is hard-wired into us. From the moment we're born, there's a basic desire to get what is best for us. When we're young, this might manifest via the desire to wrestle a building block away from our best friend. When we're older, it manifests as a desire to totally crush all and sundry with the brilliance of our fantasy football picks!

* Fantasy football is an individual pursuit. Your aim is to win for yourself rather than your favorite team, or your town or community.

* Community is a nice concept but rather wishy-washy. Most of us will state that we believe in the importance of community, but when we're pushed, it often emerges that community comes very far down our list of priorities. To see this in context, how many of us would agree to higher taxation so that the poorer members of our community can be provided for?

* Football does create a certain degree of community. Supporters congregate at the same stadium every other week, eat burgers, and moan about the referee or the ineptitude of their team's players. However, everyone's fantasy football team will be different so suddenly this togetherness falls down.

Further reading and viewing:

* Survival of the fittest: &playnext_from=PL&index=27

* Darwinism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwinism

* Fantasy Football: http://fantasy.premierleague.com/

* Richard Dawkins: http://richarddawkins.net/

* The Selfish Gene: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Selfish-Gene-Richard-Dawkins/dp/0192860925

* Community: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community

Leave a Comment

Login, or fill in the required fields below.





Allowed tags: <b> <i> <p> <br> <a> <ol> <ul> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <em> <strong> <tt> <blockquote> <div>

Submit Submit